Crossfire Phasing
[ Home ] [ Up ]

Crossfire Phasing

Most amateur antennas are copies of the ideas used in single frequency systems, like AM BC stations. Most of my work has been in HF systems in and around amateur bands. Generally these systems require wide bandwidth, rather than a certain pattern on one single frequency.

The proper way to extend bandwidth is to use cross-fire phasing, where one element's phase is rotated 180-degrees and the delay is set approximately at the spacing. Here's how it works:

We have two elements with spacing "s" at X and Y. The signals come from direction 1 or 2.

1-----X-----s------Y------2

 Let's assume X and Y are 90-degrees apart on 80 meters.

A traditional array would delay the array feed to X and Y by 180-s = 90 degrees. Assuming X lags Y by 90 degrees, the phase of a signal arriving at X from direction 1 would be 0 degrees for the reference. The signal continues on to arrive at Y 90 degrees later because of the physical distance in space. Since X lags Y in the array phasing, the phase at the common point of the feed system is now X's  phase of zero plus -90 delay is -90. The additional signal delay in space to Y is also -90. The signals are in phase, and the result is the in-phase sum of the two signals. Our receiving level has doubled over one element.

For a signal coming from 2, the phase of element Y is zero. Element X receives the signal 90-degrees later for -90 phase. That -90 adds to a -90 in the delay lines, and the result is -180 at the common point. The signals subtract exactly to zero, and there is no response.

Now assume we move the array to 160 meters, where our fixed length delay line and spacing are both 45-degrees long. The in-phase direction of 1 is still the direct sum of the two signals, but the out-of-phase direction becomes (-45) + (-45) degrees or -90 degrees at the common point. The signal vector addition is now unity. We have a very poor null!

Now let's go back to 80 meters and invert one element 180-degrees someplace in the system. In this case, we have:

From 1 we have X=0 degrees plus -90 though air is -90 at Y. Assume Y is inverted (it also works if we invert only X). The phase at Y is -90 but rotated to the opposite side of a "phase circle" by the mirror flip of 180 in element Y's inverted driving system. A -90 with a 180 flip is now +90. This combines with the -90 delay from element X through it's phasing line delay, and the sum of two equal signals of -90 and +90 is zero. -90 is exactly 180 degrees from +90, and the array now has no response towards 1.

When the signal arrives from 2, the phase is now inverted the same way and the result is perfect addition. We have Y =0 plus invert 180 is -180. Space delay is -90 plus -90 in the delay line for a net delay of -180. The result is signals from 2 are now in phase from both elements. The only change by adding a 180-degree element flip is the array inverts direction!

Here is where it gets interesting, and I am amazed so many amateur antenna designers miss this. Y is still inverted 180. When we move to 160 meters, the delay from direction 1 is:

X=0  The delay line adds -45, the same as the distance through space to Y. Since the delay line and space are the same, the delays effectively cancel. Since element Y is inverted, the combined phase at the common point is now exactly 180-degrees out of phase. the result is zero response towards 1!!!

More amazing, this is true for any frequency! There is always a perfect null towards 1 as long as the signal levels are even and impedances are matched from the two antennas, and we use a physical delay line rather than lumped components.   

From direction 2 we have:

Y=0 plus a 180 flip for -180. At X we have -45 space plus the delay line of -45 for -90. We have -90 difference. The signal is the same as the signal from one element.

The only effect, as frequency is reduced, is sensitivity of the array drops. We have less signal, but we would have that anyway even if we used the narrow band phasing systems commonly used!

Why do amateurs, who almost always move around in frequency, use single-frequency 180-s phasing systems? Probably for the same reason we use 90 and 180-degree shift in a four square. We started out wrong, and just kept doing the same thing. While this won't provide octaves of bandwidth on transmitting, it does reduce phase errors across a single band substantially. It also provides a phasing method that allows us to build receiving arrays covering octaves without any loss of null direction or depth!